顯示具有 Goldman 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Goldman 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2012年9月14日 星期五

Welcome to Goldman Sachs. Don't Get Too Comfortable

Goldman Sachs (GS) shook up the pressure-cooker world of Wall Street employment this week, doing away with the two-year analyst contracts it has bestowed on the most promising college seniors for the last quarter century.

The shift, first reported by the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, gives Goldman more flexibility in shaping its lower ranks—at a moment when those lower ranks are reshaping the industry.

Traditionally, early September is when a group of lucky college seniors, fresh off a summer internship at Goldman, receives an offer to work at the investment bank for two years. That time would be spent working hundred-hour weeks as analysts in Goldman’s rarefied corridors, meeting the right people and being groomed for future success at the firm. The next step would be business school, and then, for an even luckier subset, a return to Goldman to start a banking career in earnest. The process was highly regimented and ultracompetitive, and receiving one of those two-year offers was an ambitious person’s official acknowledgement that she was in the game.

The packages going out to college seniors this September are different, offering no two-year guarantee and placing new conditions on bonuses that were paid upon finishing the investment bank-analyst program. Why did Goldman change its terms? It’s not about axing slackers; the bank was always free to fire those who underperformed. It has more to do with giving Goldman more leverage over the best workers, discouraging them from entertaining offers from hedge funds or venture capital groups.

Goldman’s program is the most prestigious on Wall Street, but that has not stopped its members from courting other offers—especially from private funds. The bank has fired a “handful” of analysts in recent years, the Journal reported, frustrated that it was in effect training competitors’ hires and paying for the privilege.

Goldman’s decision is a reflection of how the usual Wall Street career arc has changed. Young people are taking longer to enter the industry. There are fewer jobs, and positions in the less-regulated world of hedge funds, private equity, and venture capital offer, in many cases, higher pay for less hassle. A study by PricewaterhouseCoopers in May found that nearly half of young finance graduates were looking for new jobs.

Goldman, of course, remains Goldman—not the biggest bank by capitalization, but the one with the greatest aura. It still fields tens of thousands of applications for just hundreds of jobs annually. Its analyst program has long been one of the most sought-after on Wall Street—and its alumni, the Journal noted, include several of the bank’s top executives.

Summers covers Wall Street and finance for Bloomberg Businessweek.

View the original article here

2011年6月18日 星期六

Goldman Closes the Door on Subprime

By Karen Weise and Christine Harper

When Goldman Sachs (GS) bought Litton Loan Servicing, a firm that collects mortgage payments from homeowners, in 2007 for an unannounced price, it seemed like a simple way to get an on-the-ground view of the subprime market. The insight would help Goldman Sachs figure out how much to pay for loans, and Litton would work with borrowers to get them back on track. Other sophisticated investors, including billionaire Wilbur L. Ross and private equity firm Centerbridge Capital Partners, bought mortgage servicers with a similar strategy in mind.

It didn't work out as planned. While there were plenty of distressed mortgages and lots of eager buyers, the loan holders had little incentive to mark down prices because that would mean taking a big loss on their books. "The distressed-asset market never got as hot as people were hoping it would," says Dean H. DeMeritte, an executive vice-president at Phoenix Capital, a Denver brokerage for mortgage servicing contracts.

On June 6, Goldman Sachs agreed to sell Litton to another mortgage servicer, Ocwen Financial (OCN), for $263.7 million. The sale comes two months after Goldman Sachs wrote down the value of the business by about $200 million. "It really makes sense for them to sell it," says David B. Hilder, an analyst at Susquehanna Financial Group. "They bought it at a time when the business was easier, and it looked like there might be some insights to be gained in the mortgage market from having a servicer." Neither Goldman Sachs nor Litton would comment.

Founded in 1988 by Larry B. Litton Sr. in Houston, Litton was one of the first mortgage servicers to specialize in working with troubled loans, sometimes called "scratch and dent" servicing. It developed that skill during the savings and loan crisis, when it was hired by Resolution Trust Corp. to handle mortgages that were orphaned by failed banks.

Larry Litton Jr., who now runs the company, is known in the industry for his Texas drawl, straight talk, and vocal support for working with struggling borrowers before they get too far behind. Bruce A. Gottschall, the founder of Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, a nonprofit that worked with Litton a decade ago, says the company "seemed to me a little bit more flexible in terms of modifications early on." Litton Jr. currently is a member of the Federal Reserve's Consumer Advisory Council, where he has been vocal about foreclosure prevention. Ocwen would not comment on whether he will stay with the company after the sale.

Litton's business grew with the subprime market. In 1995 it serviced $1.2 billion in loans, according to Fitch Ratings. By 2007 its portfolio had ballooned to almost $54 billion; it's about $41.2 billion today. As the boom gave way to the bust, Litton was forced to hire more staff to deal with rising defaults. The company became the target of class actions alleging excessive fees and violations of consumer-protection laws as well as investigations by state and federal regulators. It has agreed to settle at least one of the lawsuits while denying liability; others are pending. It says it is cooperating with government investigations. Goldman Sachs will remain liable for fines and penalties that could be imposed by government authorities relating to Litton's foreclosure and servicing practices before the deal closes.

With the Litton sale, Goldman Sachs will no longer deal directly with homeowners. Gottschall says Goldman's unloading the mortgage servicer is part of a bigger trend: "Wall Street is probably trying to distance themselves from the problems they caused."

The bottom line: By selling Litton Loan Servicing, Goldman Sachs is out of the messy business of working with distressed homeowners.

Weise is a reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek. Harper is a reporter for Bloomberg News.


View the original article here

2011年5月24日 星期二

U.S. Stocks Rise as Commodities Rally on Goldman Recommendation

May 24, 2011, 9:58 AM EDT By Rita Nazareth

May 24 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks rose, rebounding from a one-month low, as commodities rallied after Goldman Sachs Group Inc. signaled a positive outlook for raw materials.

Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. and AK Steel Holding Corp. rallied at least 1.5 percent. El Paso Corp., owner of the largest U.S. network of interstate natural-gas pipelines, jumped 7.1 percent amid plans to spin off its exploration and production unit. AutoZone Inc. climbed 5.1 percent as profit at the auto-parts retailer topped estimates. GT Solar International Inc. soared 11 percent after the maker of polysilicon manufacturing equipment forecast earnings that beat projections.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index increased 0.3 percent to 1,321.20 at 9:33 a.m. in New York. The gauge yesterday had the biggest decline in two months. The Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced 22.41 points, or 0.2 percent, to 12,403.67 today.

“There’s a battle between good long-term fundamentals and short-term uncertainties,” said David Kelly, who helps oversee about $445 billion as chief market strategist for JPMorgan Funds in New York. “It’s most likely that any slowdown in the global economy is temporary. There are reasons why economic growth should pick up around the world on the second half of the year. If you buy that notion, this is a good time to take advantage of that. The stock market still looks attractive for the long run.”

Commodities, Europe

The S&P 500 fell 3.4 percent through yesterday since climbing to a three-year high on April 29 amid a commodity slump and concern about Europe’s debt crisis. Still, the benchmark has rallied 4.8 percent from the end of 2010 amid government stimulus measures and higher-than-estimated earnings.

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley increased their oil price forecasts by more than 20 percent, signaling a bullish outlook for commodities. Goldman, which correctly advised investors to sell crude oil and copper last month before a price slump, boosted its 12-month prediction for Brent crude to $130 a barrel from $107, analysts led by Jeffrey Currie said in a report today. Morgan Stanley raised its Brent estimate by 20 percent to average $120 a barrel this year and by 24 percent to $130 in 2012, it said.

“Economic growth will likely be sufficient to tighten key supply-constrained markets in the second half, leading to higher prices from current levels,” the Goldman analysts said. They also advised buying copper and zinc.

‘Underweight’

The S&P GSCI spot index of 24 commodities lost about 10 percent through yesterday since New York-based Goldman told investors on April 11 to sell a basket of commodities including oil, copper and cotton, and in the same week recommended they stay “underweight” in raw materials. Global manufacturing activity measured by the JPMorgan index slowed for two consecutive months and stood at 55 in April. A reading of 50 and above suggests expansion.

Purchases of new houses probably held close to a record low in April, showing the real-estate market remains a weak link in the U.S. expansion, economists said before a report today. New homes sold at a 300,000 annual pace last month, the same as in March, according to the median forecast of 75 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. Purchases sank to a 270,000 pace in February, the weakest in 48 years of data.

Some commodities producers rallied as oil and metal prices gained. Freeport, the world’s largest publicly traded copper producer, rose 2.2 percent to $48.47. AK Steel added 1.6 percent to $14.30 as the third-largest U.S. steelmaker by sales said it will increase prices for all carbon flat-rolled steel products by at least $50 per ton to recover higher costs.

Tax-Free Spinoff

El Paso jumped 7.1 percent to $20.32. The company plans a tax-free spinoff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Douglas Foshee said at an analyst meeting in New York today. The decision comes after pipeline operator Williams Cos. said on Feb. 16 it will sell 20 percent of its production unit later this year. The company said it will sell the stake in an initial public offering and spin off the rest in 2012, to give shareholders “greater value.”

“Given the quality of El Paso’s pipeline assets, we believe there would be strong demand for a purer-play pipeline company,” Citigroup Inc. analysts Faisel Khan and Timm Schneider said in a May 20 note to clients. The exploration and production unit may be worth as much as $15 a share and it may have an $8 billion enterprise value, which includes the sum of shares and debt less cash, they wrote.

AutoZone rose 5.1 percent to $290.94. The U.S. auto-parts retailer reported third-quarter earnings of $5.29 a share, topping the $4.97 estimated by analysts on average.

GT Solar International jumped 11 percent to $12.92. The maker of polysilicon manufacturing equipment raised its 2012 earnings estimate to at least $1.55 a share, more than the average analyst estimate of $1.48 a share. The company also raised its revenue projection.

--Editors: Joanna Ossinger, Michael Regan

To contact the reporter on this story: Rita Nazareth in New York at rnazareth@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Nick Baker at nbaker7@bloomberg.net


View the original article here

Goldman Finds Perseverance Pays at Kremlin

May 23, 2011, 7:23 PM EDT By Jason Corcoran and Denis Maternovsky

May 24 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is making a third attempt in 17 years to crack the Russian market, this time by leveraging a $1 billion private-equity bet to win deals and wooing the Kremlin for roles in asset sales.

The effort is paying off. The firm has jumped to second place in advising on Russian mergers and acquisitions this year, behind Morgan Stanley, after failing to make the top three for more than a decade, data compiled by Bloomberg show. It has also secured pledges from companies including Mail.ru Group Ltd. and Tinkoff Credit Systems to arrange equity and Eurobond deals in return for investing more than $1 billion of its own money.

The bank, led by Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein, who visited Russia twice in the past year, struggled after opening its first office in Moscow in 1994. It scaled back soon after as part of a worldwide retrenchment, returned in 1998 weeks before Russia defaulted, withdrew almost entirely after the crisis and ramped up again in 2006. Since then, the firm has more than tripled its workforce in Moscow to 150.

“The old perception of Goldman Sachs in Russia is that we haven’t been consistent in our efforts in this country,” said Christopher Barter, co-head of Goldman Sachs in Russia, in an interview in Moscow May 12. “This is not the reality today.”

Advising Medvedev

Goldman Sachs, the fifth-largest U.S. bank by assets, jumped to fourth place in handling equity sales for Russian companies last year, its highest position ever, behind VTB Capital and Renaissance Capital, both based in Moscow, and Morgan Stanley. The company has underwritten the third-largest amount of foreign debt this year, up from 13th place in 2010.

While Goldman Sachs has been slower to expand in Russia than rivals such as Deutsche Bank AG and Credit Suisse Group AG because of concerns about the integrity of financial markets, it may become a co-investor alongside a new $10 billion state-owned private-equity fund, according to two sources familiar with the matter. Blankfein, 56, who along with other bank executives is advising Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on transforming Moscow into a global financial center, is also pushing to win mandates for the Kremlin’s $30 billion privatization program.

The key to success has been private equity, according to Barter, who called it “a major differentiator.”

Goldman Sachs, based in New York, has made more direct investments in privately held Russian businesses than any foreign bank, buying stakes in 15 companies totaling more than $1 billion since 2007, Barter said. The firm’s four private- equity bankers in Moscow made the purchases on the condition that Goldman Sachs get mandates later, according to a person familiar with the deals who asked not to be identified because he wasn’t authorized to speak about them.

Mail.ru Stake

“That has been a magnet for companies wanting pre-IPO financing,” said Barter, who has worked for Goldman Sachs since 1993 and became co-head of the Moscow office in 2007. A Russian speaker, he shares the job with Jean Raby, a French-Canadian who relocated to Moscow in January from Paris, where he headed operations, and is just learning the language.

Goldman Sachs’s investment in Moscow-based Mail.ru helped the bank score a role in the Russian internet company’s $912 million initial public offering in London in November. The stock surged as much as 41 percent on its first day of trading as the IPO was more than 20 times oversubscribed. Goldman Sachs has since helped Mail.ru founder Yuri Milner, CEO of Russian venture-capital firm Digital Sky Technologies, and his partner, Alisher Usmanov, raise $1 billion to finance future investments.

‘Global Behemoth’

“DST is an amazing case study,” said Barter, whose first client in Russia was Milner, 49. “Something really small and unknown in Russia that develops into something truly entrepreneurial, and then grows into a global behemoth by focusing on the Internet and not the commodity space.”

DST Global, Milner’s first fund, owns about 10 percent of social-networking company Facebook Inc., based in Palo Alto, California. He and Usmanov have backed some of Silicon Valley’s fastest-growing businesses. They led a $135 million investment last year in Groupon Inc., the largest provider of online daily deal coupons, and were part of a group that put $180 million into Zynga Game Network Inc., a social-gaming service, in 2009.

Goldman Sachs raised $1.5 billion for Facebook in January in a round of financing that valued the firm at $50 billion.

Along with Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs is also managing this week’s IPO on the Nasdaq Stock Market for Yandex NV, the owner of Russia’s most popular search engine.

Private-Equity Fund

“Goldman is a credible player in Russia, and now it has individual success stories like Mail.ru to showcase,” said Kirill Dmitriev, a former Goldman Sachs banker appointed May 18 to run the government’s $10 billion private-equity fund.

The bank also acquired a stake in Tinkoff, a Moscow-based credit-card issuer, in 2007, according to two people familiar with the matter. Goldman Sachs and Citigroup Inc. managed the sale of $175 million of Tinkoff bonds in April. Barter declined to discuss the firm’s clients, and Oleg Tinkov, the owner of the company, couldn’t be reached for comment.

The same month Goldman Sachs also managed the sale of $1 billion of 10-year bonds for Alfa Bank, Russia’s biggest private lender, and $850 million of Eurobonds for Evraz Group SA, the country’s second-largest steelmaker.

Foreign private-equity companies, except Forth Worth, Texas-based TPG Capital, have avoided Russia, which remains a difficult place to do business. The country is the world’s most corrupt major economy, according to Berlin-based Transparency International’s 2010 Corruption Perceptions Index. It ranked 154th among 178 countries, tied with Tajikistan and Kenya.

Investor ‘Uncertainty’

“There’s political uncertainty for investors ahead of next year’s presidential elections, but also uncertainty about reasonable investor interests being upheld in many cases,” said Richard Hainsworth, CEO of RusRating, an independent credit- ratings firm in Moscow.

David A. Viniar, Goldman Sachs’s chief financial officer, expressed similar concerns to investors in February 2006, four months before Blankfein was appointed chairman and CEO, saying it isn’t “clear to us that the Russian authorities are as set on turning the financial markets into modern financial markets with the rule of law as the Chinese authorities are.”

Goldman Sachs first did business in Russia in 1926, when Western banks, including many from the U.S., helped the Communist government raise cash for rural electrification and other projects. The window closed in 1929 when Josef Stalin consolidated power and the U.S. stock market crashed.

1994 Opening

The 142-year-old firm didn’t open an office in Russia until 1994, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, only to pull back in a global retrenchment. The bank returned in June 1998, weeks before the Russian government defaulted on ruble debt, causing hundreds of millions of dollars in trading losses for securities firms worldwide. While the company maintained a representative office in Moscow after the default, it significantly scaled back operations, according to a person familiar with the matter.

“They didn’t see how they could make money then,” said Chris Weafer, chief strategist at UralSib Financial Corp. in Moscow. “Goldman has been accused of many things, but it has never been confused with a charity. It’s always all about making money, and Russia is no different.”

Not long after Blankfein took over in June 2006, he sent David Schwimmer, his Russian-speaking former chief of staff, to Moscow to help run investment banking. The firm won approval that year to become a stand-alone broker-dealer and opened an office in 2007 to accommodate securities sales and trading. In 2008, it got permission to set up a bank.

Letter to Putin

Blankfein has been courting the Kremlin since at least April 2007, when he wrote to then-President Vladimir Putin seeking a meeting to discuss expanding operations. He told investors in New York in June 2007 that the firm couldn’t afford to miss opportunities in Russia and other developing economies.

“If you forgo the opportunities in emerging markets, you’re putting your global franchise at risk,” Blankfein said at the time, acknowledging that he had built his career “in part on not being seduced by certain fads of people investing in emerging markets.”

The bank’s board of directors travelled to Russia in June 2008 for a four-day meeting split between St. Petersburg and Moscow. The trip included a tour of the State Hermitage Museum, a private session with Putin and a speech by former Russian leader Mikhail Gorbachev, according to an account in Andrew Ross Sorkin’s book about the 2008 global financial crisis.

BRIC Capital

Today, deploying capital to the so-called BRIC countries -- Brazil, Russia, India and China -- is a priority for Goldman Sachs’s securities division, Barclays analysts wrote in a research note on May 11 after meeting with Viniar and David B. Heller and Harvey M. Schwartz, two of four co-heads at the bank’s securities unit.

Part of the allure for foreign investment banks is advisory work on the government’s plan to sell $30 billion of assets by 2015 to replenish state coffers and improve corporate governance. The Kremlin is auctioning companies including OAO Sovcomflot, Russia’s biggest shipper, and OAO Russian Railways, the rail monopoly, to help cover a budget shortfall it sees at about 1 percent of gross domestic product this year. It expects privatizations to generate about 1 trillion rubles ($32 billion) in the next three years.

Russia’s last major IPO of a state-owned company was in 2007, when VTB Group, the country’s second-biggest lender, raised $8 billion. Goldman Sachs, which worked alongside Deutsche Bank and New York-based Citigroup on the offering, was selected with 22 other lenders to be an adviser on the new round of asset sales.

‘Greater Opportunity’

“Banks, such as Goldman, will have a considerably greater opportunity to earn fees from deals and advisory work than was the case over the past 10 years,” said UralSib’s Weafer. “The next government will have to accelerate efforts to make the economy more efficient and to raise investment spending to create new industries and to improve infrastructure. Otherwise the country faces a much slower growth outlook and, potentially, a risk of social instability.”

Russia will emerge from the global financial crisis by 2012 and must double productivity over the next decade to achieve its goal of becoming one of the top five economies, Putin, now prime minister, said on April 20. The economy expanded 4 percent last year, rebounding from the worst recession since the Soviet era. It contracted 7.8 percent in 2009, in the wake of the global credit crunch, after posting an average annual growth rate of almost 7 percent from 1999 to 2008.

Deutsche Bank Falters

While investment-banking competition has stiffened with the emergence of domestic players such as VTB, Goldman Sachs is doing better than Deutsche Bank, which has regressed since 2007, when it was the top manager of equity sales in Russia, second in M&A and third in Eurobonds. VTB, which created a brokerage in 2008, has hired more than 100 people from its German rival. Last year, Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank was sixth in equities and M&A and seventh in Eurobonds.

Andrew Chulack, head of global banking at Deutsche Bank in Russia, said his company is “well-positioned” and had regained momentum following the financial crisis. Deutsche Bank is the second-biggest manager of equity deals this year, having worked on a $640 million IPO for Nomos Bank and VTB’s $3 billion share sale. In the Eurobond market, its bankers are in seventh place.

VTB’s emergence hurt domestic banks more than foreign ones, Chulack said.

‘Good Niche’

“VTB has a good niche, is very well-positioned locally, but is not a direct competitor to us or other foreign investment banks on deals,” he said.

Renaissance Capital, a Moscow-based investment bank half owned by billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov, declined to comment, as did Troika Dialog, Moscow’s oldest brokerage, which is being acquired by OAO Sberbank, Russia’s largest lender.

“The independent banks were under pressure because they didn’t have big balance sheets,” said Rustam Botashev, deputy head of research at UniCredit SpA in Moscow.

Morgan Stanley and Zurich-based Credit Suisse have both profited in Russia because of consistent commitment and strong leadership, RusRating’s Hainsworth said.

“A great deal of work here is down to relationship with the company or the oligarch,” he said.

Last year was the biggest for Russian M&A since 2007, helped by 96 deals worth $50.9 billion in the fourth quarter alone, according to Bloomberg data. Goldman Sachs, second to New York-based Morgan Stanley last year, advised on 21 deals worth $36 billion, including Wind Telecomunicazioni SpA’s $6.5 billion merger in April with VimpelCom Ltd., Russia’s third-largest mobile phone operator.

The bank is currently advising Russian potash producer OAO Uralkali on its $7.8 billion acquisition of rival OAO Silvinit.

Bond-Sale Fees

Managing bond sales helps banks to increase their role in other revenue-generating businesses, including trading the debt and providing borrowers with hedging instruments and loans. Fees from debt origination account at most for about 2 percent of banks’ revenue, according to Mark Rubinstein, deputy head of research at IFC Metropol in Moscow.

Banks get lower fees for underwriting ruble bonds compared with sales in the U.S. Underwriters charge between 0.05 percent of the issue and 0.15 percent for the most creditworthy issuers, and as much as 0.2 percent for “second-tier” companies, said Evgeny Vorobyev, a fixed-income analyst at Otkritie Financial Corp., a brokerage in Moscow partly owned by VTB. The rates compare with average fees of 0.593 percent for U.S. corporate bonds sold this year, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Goldman Sachs, which has an offshore Russian wealth- management unit in London, plans to hire more personnel in the Russian capital, according to Raby, co-head of the office there.

Hainsworth, a former Renaissance Capital banker who has worked in Russia since 1981, remains skeptical about the bank’s prospects, notwithstanding its recent advances.

“Each time, Goldman has come with a big fanfare and said they were committed before turning on their tails and running,” he said.

--With assistance from Brad Cook in Moscow, Anne-Sylvaine Chassany in London and Christine Harper in New York. Editors: Robert Friedman, Peter Eichenbaum

To contact the reporters on this story: Jason Corcoran at jcorcoran13@bloomberg.net; Denis Maternovsky in Moscow at dmaternovsky@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Gavin Serkin at gserkin@bloomberg.net


View the original article here

2011年5月12日 星期四

Goldman Sachs Viewed Unfavorably by 54% as Poll Shows No Damage

May 12, 2011, 12:22 AM EDT By Christine Harper

(For more on the poll, {POLL })

May 12 (Bloomberg) -- Wall Street conventional wisdom holds that a sterling reputation is crucial to winning business and keeping clients. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. may be the exception, according to a new Bloomberg survey.

Fifty-four percent of respondents to the global poll of traders, investors and analysts conducted May 9-10 have an unfavorable opinion of the New York-based bank, more than double the negative rating for JPMorgan Chase & Co. Yet a month after a U.S. Senate report said Goldman Sachs misled clients, 78 percent of those surveyed said the accusations will either have no effect on the firm or will harm its reputation without driving away customers.

“Investors will continue to put their money with capable institutions, regardless of their history or morality,” said poll participant Christian Contino, 27, who works as a consultant for the investment-management section of the United Nations’ International Fund for Agricultural Development. The bank has “very capable spin doctors who will be able to downplay any negativity.”

Stephen Cohen, a spokesman for the company, declined to comment on the poll results.

Goldman Sachs, led by Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Lloyd C. Blankfein, survived the financial crisis, unlike some smaller rivals, and has been a target of criticism ever since. The bank, the fifth-biggest in the U.S. by assets, agreed to pay $550 million last year to settle a suit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission that alleged Goldman Sachs misled buyers of a mortgage-linked investment the firm created in 2007.

Housing Bets

The Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, led by Michigan Democrat Carl M. Levin, used Goldman Sachs as a case study in its two-year examination of the financial crisis. When the subcommittee released its 640-page report last month, Levin said that Goldman Sachs misled clients and Congress about the firm’s bets on the housing market.

“The testimony we gave was truthful and accurate and this is confirmed by the subcommittee’s own report,” Lucas van Praag, a Goldman Sachs spokesman, said at the time.

“It seems unlikely that Goldman Sachs has to expect further consequences,” said Daniel Horak, 26, a trader at Erste Sparinvest KAG in Vienna, Austria, who replied in the poll that he had a “mostly unfavorable” view of the firm and that he didn’t expect Goldman Sachs to lose customers.

Levin and Oklahoma Senator Thomas A. Coburn, the subcommittee’s ranking Republican, formally referred their report to the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are reviewing the findings.

JPMorgan’s Reputation

The company was viewed less favorably than other banks by the 1,263 poll respondents. While 54 percent said they had an unfavorable view of Goldman Sachs, 25 percent felt the same about JPMorgan, 49 percent for Citigroup Inc. and 48 percent for Bank of America Corp. Thirty-five percent had an unfavorable view of Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank AG, which was also singled out in the U.S. Senate subcommittee report.

Blankfein, 56, has tried to burnish Goldman Sachs’s image. After the SEC filed its lawsuit last year, he established a committee to study the firm’s business standards. The committee’s report in January made 39 recommendations, including changing financial disclosures and providing simpler explanations to clients about conflicts of interest.

Goldman Sachs also began an advertising campaign in September that emphasizes the firm’s role in job creation and alternative energy.

‘Confidence Business’

“We have to regain the trust of the public, we have no choice,” Blankfein said in an interview with Fareed Zakaria that aired on CNN on May 2, 2010, according to a transcript. “We can’t survive without people thinking well of us,” he said, because “our business is a confidence business.”

Goldman Sachs’s stock price, which was $147.88 at the close on the New York Stock Exchange yesterday, remains below the $184.27 close on April 15, 2010, the day before the SEC filed its lawsuit.

Thirty-six percent of respondents said they were “generally bullish” on Goldman Sachs stock six months from now, while 32 percent were “generally bearish.” The rest had no opinion. That divided sentiment is about where it was in June 2010.

The company’s profit slid 38 percent last year as revenue tumbled. Goldman Sachs ranks third this year among advisers on global takeovers after coming in second during 2010, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

‘Very Supportive’

“Our shareholders, our clients, have been very, very supportive,” Blankfein said in the CNN interview. “They know the essence of who we are, and frankly I think we still enjoy a reputation with those -- a good reputation with those key constituent groups.”

The UN fund’s Contino, who like 32 percent of poll respondents said he had a favorable view of Goldman Sachs, was also among the 42 percent who think that Blankfein will remain chairman a year from now. Twenty-seven percent didn’t think Blankfein would still have the job in a year and 31 percent had no opinion.

“Lloyd Blankfein has done a great job over the past 5 years,” Contino said. “If there has to be a fall guy, it won’t be him.”

Noah Shapiro, director of risk management at Optim Energy LLC in Irving, Texas, was one of the poll respondents who said Blankfein won’t be chairman in a year.

Main Street Ire

“Goldman has significantly drawn the ire of Main Street as being the poster child of the inexorable greed that fomented the credit crisis,” Shapiro, 34, said. “Blankfein will need to fall on his sword as not only the head of Goldman Sachs, but also as a chief luminary on the Street, to blot away the stain of manipulative financial engineering.”

The quarterly Bloomberg Global Poll of investors, traders and analysts who are Bloomberg subscribers was conducted by Selzer & Co., a Des Moines, Iowa-based firm. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percentage points.

“Opinions on Goldman Sachs are the same the world around, with very little difference across the U.S., Europe or Asia,” said J. Ann Selzer, president of Selzer & Co.

--Editors: Steve Dickson, Rick Green

To contact the reporter on this story: Christine Harper in New York at charper@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: David Scheer at dscheer@bloomberg.net.


View the original article here