顯示具有 Firms 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Firms 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2012年6月1日 星期五

Chinese Private Equity Firms Flex Their Muscles

Not that long ago, Blackstone Group (BX), TPG Capital, Goldman Sachs Group (GS), and other foreign buyout specialists had little trouble muscling out local rivals for deals in China. Today, Chinese firms dominate the private equity landscape. Investments by Chinese firms in the world’s second-biggest private equity market rose to $7.8 billion last year, overtaking for the first time the $7.4 billion that came in from U.S. and European funds, according to Asian Venture Capital Journal.

The shift coincides with China’s stepped-up efforts to develop homegrown private equity firms such as Beijing-based Hony Capital. Local firms enjoy privileges over foreign rivals when it comes to regulations and access to funding in yuan, also known as renminbi. “Renminbi fund managers have a huge advantage in terms of speed of execution as well as easier exit opportunities within China,” says Chris Meads, Hong Kong-based global head of investment at Pantheon, a London private equity company that has invested $2.7 billion in Asia. “Deal flow is being diverted to renminbi funds because it’s just easier for them.”

The Chinese government treats local businesses that receive capital in U.S. dollars or other foreign currency as foreign-invested enterprises, which means additional layers of required approvals from regulators, even for actions as routine as opening a retail store. “Many Chinese companies realize taking money from any foreign-currency fund will result in more restrictive scrutiny, and they just can’t stand the red tape,” says Jessie Jin, a Shanghai-based partner at venture capital firm GGV Capital in Menlo Park, Calif.

To counter this challenge, Goldman Sachs announced its first yuan fund in China in May, followed by Morgan Stanley (MS) a week later. In February, TPG Capital, the Fort Worth-based buyout firm, said it raised 4 billion yuan ($630 million) in a first round of fundraising for its renminbi fund, 90 percent coming from private investors in China. “For the global players aiming for a large market share in China, without renminbi funds, you probably feel more or less insufficient,” says Eric Zhang, a Beijing-based managing director at Carlyle Group, which runs a private equity fund with the Beijing municipal government.

Whether renminbi investments by foreign managers get the same regulatory treatment as domestic private equity funds is subject to interpretation by local authorities. China hasn’t formulated nationwide rules governing the private equity industry because there is little cooperation among regulators, including the National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the People’s Bank of China, the central bank. Global funds also have been tripped up by currency-conversion restrictions, GGV’s Jin says. Companies receiving investments in foreign currencies can’t exchange them for yuan all at once. They need separate approvals to convert portions of those funds to pay employees or buy equipment, she says.

Domestic private equity firms have an edge over global rivals because they’re more focused on just one market, says Hony Capital Chief Executive Officer John Zhao, who raised 10 billion yuan last year for the firm’s second renminbi fund, doubling the size of a previous one in 2008. “Our decisions will be quicker” than foreign funds, he says.

Executives from Carlyle and Goldman Sachs counter that big Chinese companies still prefer to deal with well-known foreign investors because of the expertise they provide in listing abroad as well as orchestrating cross-border acquisitions. “To stay competitive, we need a local fund and a local team, but we always have to deliver value on top of capital,” says Stephanie Hui, a Hong Kong-based managing director at Goldman Sachs’s private equity unit.

Despite the increased local competition, executives at global private equity firms say they’re still finding opportunities to invest in transactions that give them managerial control. Buyout deals in China more than doubled last year, to the highest level ever, data compiled by consulting firm Bain show. Leveraged buyouts increased to $7.5 billion, from $5.9 billion in 2010, according to Preqin, a London-based data provider.

While global firms face multiple bidders for good businesses in China, the number of target companies also is rising, says Goldman Sachs’s Hui. “There are still attractive deals for foreign investors in China,” Pantheon’s Meads says. “They have to work a lot harder than they have in the past to get them.”

The bottom line: Since 2008 the number of Chinese private equity firms has almost doubled to 129. Foreign firms face regulatory and funding challenges.


View the original article here

2011年6月5日 星期日

Buyout Firms Seek New Horizons

C:\Documents

Bloomberg

By Cristina Alesci and Jason Kelly

Stephen A. Schwarzman, David M. Rubenstein, Henry R. Kravis, and George R. Roberts became billionaires by engineering leveraged buyouts. Now they're transforming their companies into asset managers that run everything from hedge funds to strip malls as fresh capital and takeover targets become scarce.

Schwarzman's Blackstone Group (BX), the biggest private equity firm, is earning twice as much from owning property, including office buildings in India and seniors communities in Oregon, as from buyouts. Kravis and Roberts's KKR (KKR) owns a stake in a 5,500-mile U.S. fuel pipeline and lends to distressed companies. "The large-cap leveraged buyout business has become mature," says Colin C. Blaydon, director of the Center for Private Equity & Entrepreneurship at Dartmouth College's Tuck School of Business. In the future, private equity firms will look "more like the large money-management enterprises, with a big emphasis on assets under management."

The firms have little choice if they want to grow. For one thing, the increase in the number of buyout funds—to 470 today from 60 in 1990—has made raising money harder. "As the business exploded, more and more people rushed into private equity, which made competition for money fierce," says Richard I. Beattie, chairman of law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, who helped KKR with its $30 billion takeover of RJR Nabisco in 1989 and remains an adviser to many private equity firms.

Stock prices have doubled in a two-year rally, making takeover candidates more expensive. And while deal activity is increasing, private equity firms are encountering more competition from corporate buyers with lots of cash. Blackstone, which is raising a $15 billion fund, committed only $550 million to private equity deals in the first quarter.

Blackstone's largest investment in the last 12 months was the $9.4 billion deal to buy 593 U.S. shopping centers in 39 states from Australia's Centro Properties Group. It would be the largest cash purchase of real estate in the world since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, Schwarzman, 64, said during an April conference call with investors.

Co-founder Rubenstein has steered Washington-based Carlyle Group, ranked second by assets under management, into the fund-of-funds business by taking over AlpInvest, a Dutch company that spreads money for investors among buyout funds. Rubenstein, 61, also agreed to buy a majority stake in Claren Road Asset Management, a hedge fund that trades debt. "We're building new products and adding new geographies and people to give our clients more choice and asset-diversification options," he says.

KKR, created in 1976 by Kravis, Roberts, and Jerome Kohlberg, has ventured into underwriting stock and bond offerings, investing in infrastructure deals, making and buying loans, and, most recently, operating hedge funds.

Leon D. Black's Apollo Global Management, which completed a $565 million initial public offering in March, has been scouring European banks for what it calls "stranded assets," including $2 billion of nonperforming commercial loans, President Marc A. Spilker told investors on May 12. Another $240 million is earmarked for "longevity-based assets"—a bet on the value of life insurance policies Apollo is buying from banks.

These private equity managers are trying to boost returns by going where rivals can't because they lack the firepower, or by taking advantage of distressed sellers. "In virtually all recent transactions, Blackstone has faced limited competition due to the magnitude of capital required and the complexity of the transactions," Schwarzman told investors in April.

Even so, private equity firms may not find asset management and real estate as profitable as buyouts. Private equity firms typically collect a 1.5 percent to 2 percent fee on assets under management and incentive fees equal to 20 percent of any profit. While the new businesses may produce comparable management fees, they can offer little or no incentive fees.


View the original article here