顯示具有 Regulator 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Regulator 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2012年6月22日 星期五

China's Top Regulator Woos Investors

Carrie Pan is about as intrepid as they come. Since she began investing in Chinese stocks six years ago, the 29-year-old Shanghai accountant has seen almost half the value of her portfolio evaporate, including a 40 percent loss last year alone. Undeterred, Pan recently bought 1,000 shares of Yang Quan Coal Industry Group. “I believe stocks will rise,” says Pan, watching her holdings on a computer screen in her two-bedroom apartment on a recent afternoon of maternity leave. “Guo has already done lots of things to support the stock market since he took office, and he is very keen on improving the market’s performance.”

That would be Guo Shuqing, who in October was appointed chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the equivalent of the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. A fluent English speaker, Guo is also a former vice governor of the central bank and most recently was chairman of China Construction Bank, the nation’s second-largest lender by market value. His challenge is modernizing China’s capital markets so that they can better support the country’s $6 trillion economy.

Photograph by Jason Lee/Reuters

In the last few months he has set about instituting reforms to shore up investor confidence, wean businesses off state-backed financing, and lure more foreign money into China. “Our current stage of work is focused on improving the fair play of the market, protecting investors’ legal rights, and enhancing the ability of serving the real economy,” Guo, 56, said in a People’s Daily report posted on the CSRC website in March.

A key aim for Guo is restoring the trust of investors who’ve taken a beating in the stock market over the last few years. After peaking at 6,092 in 2007, the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index fell to just above 1,700 by the end of 2008. Four trillion yuan ($630 billion) of government stimulus provided a temporary lift in 2009, yet the market fell another 33 percent from 2010 through 2011. China’s 50 million individual investors lost an average of 40,000 yuan last year, according to a May 9 People’s Daily report. To entice them back into the market, Guo has urged listed companies to pay more cash dividends and persuaded the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges to cut stock-trading fees by 25 percent.

He also has taken aim at China’s initial public offerings. Over the last year individual investors were burned by a series of overpriced offerings that plunged after their debuts, including that of Sinovel Wind Group, China’s biggest maker of wind turbines. The stock is down about 60 percent since the company began trading in January 2011. The CSRC has taken steps to prevent overpricing of IPOs. If the price-to-earnings ratio of an IPO is expected to be 25 percent higher than that of publicly traded companies in the same industry, the company will need to disclose the factors that went into the pricing decision, the CSRC said in an April 28 statement. The CSRC will now invite as many as 10 individual investors to advise on IPO pricing, a role previously restricted to institutional investors. Guo is dealing with “all the historical hangover,” says Dai Ming, a fund manager at Shanghai Kingsun Investment Management & Consulting. “That’s definitely very helpful for the healthy, long-term development of China’s capital market.”

Guo also has moved to attract more cash from outside the country. Only approved foreign institutional investors can buy or sell yuan-denominated securities. In April the CSRC announced that it would nearly triple the amount that approved investors can invest in Chinese securities, to $80 billion.

Next on the agenda: the bond market. For years China’s bond market has amounted to little more than money shuffling between state entities, with state-owned companies selling their debt to state-owned banks at controlled interest rates, and banks holding the bonds on their books. In this cozy system, corporations aren’t allowed to default. Borrowers that come close are bailed out by local governments and banks. As a result, China’s bond market is tiny. At $661 billion, it’s just 9 percent of China’s gross domestic product. In the U.S., the $7.9 trillion in fixed-income securities equals more than half the country’s total economic output. A more active bond market would provide funding for small businesses and divert risk away from banks, which provide 75 percent of the nation’s credit via loans.

In early June Guo launched a plan to let small and medium-sized companies sell debt comparable to speculative-grade bonds. Translation: Get ready for Chinese junk bonds. The first went on sale as a private placement on June 8, with a 50 million yuan offering by Suzhou Huadong Coating Glass. Speculative-grade offerings could lead to China’s first corporate default—which could be a good thing because it would help bond investors price risk, says John Sun, managing director at Citic Securities International in Hong Kong. “The high-yield issuers will be small companies, so the impact on the whole market will be small,” he says. Psychologically, though, it will be important because it will show investors that the market is operating freely. “For a mature bond market, we should allow some firms to go bust,” says Sun.

Pushing through these reforms has required Guo to consolidate his power over other regulatory agencies, moves that could create enemies who might stymie his efforts. “What he needs to do is pick fights he can win,” says Fraser Howie, a Singapore-based managing director of CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets.

Guo has already shown his bureaucratic dexterity. From 2001 through 2005 he was head of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, which manages China’s foreign exchange reserves. In that role Guo pushed through reforms by forging relationships between departments and building support for his positions, according to Hong Weizhi, a former SAFE spokesman. In the end, it’s all about inspiring confidence, something Guo seems to be good at. Says Hao Hong, chief China strategist at Bocom International Holdings in Hong Kong, “Guo is the man.”

The bottom line: Guo is trying to build a bond market and lure investors back to stocks after the market fell 33 percent from 2010 through 2011.


View the original article here

2011年5月19日 星期四

Risky Banks to Face Scrutiny From U.K. Regulator, Sants Says

May 19, 2011, 11:16 AM EDT By Ben Moshinsky and Scott Hamilton

(Updates with lawyer comment in 11th paragraph.)

May 19 (Bloomberg) -- The Prudential Regulatory Authority plans to crack down on risky U.K. banks when it takes over financial regulation next year, restricting the dividends and bonuses of lenders at an earlier stage.

Lenders considered a risk to financial stability by the PRA, which will take over bank supervision by the end of 2012, will also face limits on leverage until their business stabilizes, the Financial Services Authority said in a statement today.

“This supervisory approach, to be effective, will need to be based on judgment and a forward-looking assessment of risk,” Hector Sants, who will lead the PRA and is the current chief executive officer of the FSA, said in a speech in London today.

Sants has been pledging more “intrusive” regulation since shortly after the start of the global financial crisis. The government is pushing through the biggest shakeup in financial regulation since 1997, scrapping the FSA and handing its supervisory powers to the new regulator within the Bank of England.

The plan would also create a Financial Policy Committee in the central bank to oversee economic stability risks.

“In cases where a firm’s viability is under threat, the PRA will take supervisory action at an early stage to reduce the probability of disorderly failure,” Andrew Bailey, the deputy- CEO of the PRA, said in a speech.

Bank Failure

The new regulator will allow banks to fail and “will not view the failure of an institution in an orderly manner as regulatory failure, but rather as a feature of a properly functioning market,” the FSA said in its statement.

“Clearly the new supervisory process will look at all aspects of each bank’s operations and we feel that the specific reference to bonuses is sadly playing to politicians and the press rather than providing a greater insight into the supervision process,” a Mediobanca SpA analyst said in a note to clients.

The U.K. government provided a 45 billion-pound ($73 billion) bailout to Royal Bank of Scotland Plc in 2008 after it ran up the biggest loss in U.K. corporate history following its acquisition of ABN Amro Holding NV.

Sants said in his speech that part of the reason for the FSA’s failures was that “it never achieved the full support of Parliament and the public.” The PRA must be able to repair those relationships.

Judgmental

“The PRA is prepared to be judgmental and will challenge managers on fundamental aspects of their business," said Ash Saluja, a financial services lawyer at CMS Cameron McKenna LLP in London. ‘‘Unlike the FSA, the new regulator will be able to reach a different view than managers and confront them on the risk involved in their operations."

Sants said the agency needs public support.

‘‘It is vital to its reputation and authority and ultimately its ability to deliver on society’s expectation that the PRA’s powers and statutory obligations are fully understood and supported by society,’’ Sants said.

U.K. banks will also be required to publish more detailed information about their activities to encourage greater market discipline, Bailey said.

‘‘We recognize that management, shareholders, creditors and auditors all play an important role in managing prudential risk,’’ Bailey said. ‘‘To encourage more market discipline, the PRA will seek to publish some regulatory returns, though it will not go so far as to disclose its own supervisory judgments about firms.’’

U.K. Lenders

Bailey last month joined the FSA as the deputy head of its Prudential Business Unit, as well as becoming director of the organization’s division overseeing U.K. lenders.

He will become the deputy head of the PRA, which is proposed to be responsible for regulating all deposit-taking institutions, insurers and investment banks.

Sants said that the PRA would scrutinize firms’ bonus payouts on an ‘‘individual and aggregate level” to make sure that banks that make large payments keep enough capital in reserve to whether crises.

The regulator would examine “total payouts to employees and make sure they aren’t putting at risk the capital position of the institution,” Sants said.

--Editors: Christopher Scinta, Peter Chapman

To contact the reporters on this story: Ben Moshinsky in London at bmoshinsky@bloomberg.net; Scott Hamilton in London at shamilton8@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at aaarons@bloomberg.net; Craig Stirling at cstirling1@bloomberg.net


View the original article here