顯示具有 Obamas 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Obamas 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2012年9月25日 星期二

Romney's Housing Plan Looks a Lot Like Obama's

Amid a Friday afternoon focused squarely on the details of Mitt Romney’s 2011 tax returns, the Republican candidate also quietly released a white paper on the candidate’s housing policy. As I’ve written before, the campaigns have remained quite silent on housing and foreclosures, even though the housing market’s struggles are arguably the biggest impediment to a broader recovery and more than one in five homeowners owe more than their houses are worth. The new Romney plan document is all of seven pages long—one of those pages is the cover, and three pages lay out the current situation and bash Obama’s policies. That leaves a one-page executive summary that recaps the two pages that actually outline the “plan.”

That part of the plan is, shall we say, light on details. So much so that Business Insider’s Joe Weisenthal wrote (in his headline no less) that the paper “has got to be a joke.” He pointed to how Romney addressed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government sponsored enterprises that guarantee mortgages and got a nearly $190 billion bailout. The white paper says: “The Romney-Ryan plan will completely end ‘too-big-to-fail’ by reforming the GSEs. … Rather than just talk about reform, a Romney-Ryan Administration will protect taxpayers from additional risk in the future by reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and provide a long-term, sustainable solution for the future of housing finance reform in our country.” Got that? So Romney will reform them and do something new. How Romney will “reform” them and what will replace them isn’t specified. Republicans typically talk about ending the GSEs, so if reforming them involves something different, it could be a departure from the views of many in the party.

Other parts of the Romney plan look an awful lot like what Obama’s plan has done—much of which has had only a limited impact. Romney wants to “responsibly” sell the 200,000 vacant homes that the GSEs picked up when borrowers defaulted and faced foreclosure. He explains that the government can do this by “returning these homes to private hands and renting them out.” The GSEs already began in February with a pilot to sell 2,500 homes and recently sold the first part of that portfolio.

Romney also wants to make it easier for struggling borrowers to get foreclosure alternatives such as short sales, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, and modifications. As we’ve reported before, promoting these alternatives has been the Obama administration’s primary anti foreclosure tool—and that approach has had limited success. For example, a recent academic analysis found the administrations’ efforts will increase the number of loan modifications that banks make by only about 0.7 percent. That’s because the big banks that service mortgages have done a lousy job of implementing the program. Interestingly, the Romney plan briefly mentions support for “shared appreciation” modifications, in which servicers write down the principal of a mortgage and then get a cut of any price increase when a homeowner eventually sells the home. The Obama administration started supporting principal reduction this summer, but this would be quite a departure from the stance of many Republicans, who say that principal reduction encourages people to default purposely on their loans.

In perhaps the most marked difference from Obama, Romney calls for the repeal of Dodd-Frank and to replace it with “sensible” regulation that will “eliminate the regulatory uncertainty that is paralyzing lenders.” What those regulations will be, or how they’ll protect consumers while opening up more private lending, isn’t clear.

Taken together, perhaps it’s not surprising Romney buried the release on a Friday afternoon after posting the headline-grabbing tax documents.


View the original article here

2012年1月12日 星期四

Citigroup Lobbyist Casts Doubt on Obama’s Recess Appointment

January 11, 2012, 10:56 PM EST By Donal Griffin

Jan. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc.’s lobbyist said President Barack Obama’s decision to make Richard Cordray head of the new financial watchdog agency wasn’t a “recess” appointment and may face a court challenge.

Naming Cordray to run the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau while the Senate held “pro forma” sessions left the White House open to legal action, especially from financial firms facing new rules, Candida Wolff, Citigroup’s executive vice president for global government affairs, said in an interview today.

“I don’t think this was a recess appointment,” said Wolff, who was chief lobbyist for President George W. Bush and now represents the third-biggest U.S. bank by assets. “I struggle with the fact that a session is still a session, and you can have business within that session.” Cordray’s authority to oversee non-banks and non-financial companies “will probably be one area where I can see action,” she said.

Obama had drawn fire for using his power to make appointments while Congress is out of session. Obama installed Cordray, a former Ohio attorney general, as consumer bureau director on Jan. 4, drawing objections from Republicans who opposed the agency’s creation. Senate members met every few days specifically to block recess appointees.

Court Challenges

“Legal challenges to the appointment are likely to come from every quarter -- from individuals to community and labor groups to possibly even Congress,” Wolff said in comments posted on the New York-based bank’s website. “Will the rules, regulations and proposals coming out of the bureau be stuck in limbo for the foreseeable future, and what impact will such uncertainty have on those who must decide how to comply with their rulings?”

Wolff said she’s not aware of any litigation planned by Citigroup or the American Bankers Association, the industry’s Washington lobby. Citigroup supports the goal of more transparency, choice and control for banking customers, according to Molly Millerwise Meiners, a Citigroup spokeswoman. She declined to comment on Cordray’s appointment as a matter of company policy.

“We’re not weighing in on the political arguments,” Wolff said in the interview. “We’re weighing into some of the questions that have to be resolved.”

Citigroup received a $45 billion U.S. bailout during the financial crisis, which has since been repaid.

White House Response

“The Senate has effectively been in recess for weeks, and is expected to remain in recess for weeks,” White House spokesman Eric Schultz said in a statement. Lawyers who advised President Bush also rejected pro-forma sessions, said Schultz, who called them a “sham” designed to keep Obama from doing his job. “Gimmicks do not override the president’s constitutional authority to make appointments to keep the government running,” he said.

Wolff is a lawyer whose career included a stint as deputy staff director for the Senate Republican Policy Committee, according to an April 2011 Citigroup statement when she joined the bank. She wondered on Citigroup’s website whether Cordray’s elevation -- as well as three recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board -- would further damage relations between Republicans and Obama while setting a precedent for future contentious hires.

“If things weren’t tense before, the political stakes have been upped,” Wolff wrote. “Add to that a hostile election-year environment and even the most non-controversial piece of legislation may not make it in 2012.”

Maurice “Hank” Greenberg, who led bailed-out insurer American International Group Inc. for almost four decades until he was ousted in 2005, called Cordray’s appointment unconstitutional. Greenberg, 86, is chairman and chief executive officer of insurer C.V. Starr & Co.

“The president’s stuck his finger in the eye of Congress,” Greenberg told Betty Liu today on Bloomberg TV’s “In the Loop.” “You need the approval of the Senate for that appointment. It was bypassed. That doesn’t lead for a great relationship.”

--With assistance from Phil Mattingly, Hans Nichols and Kathleen Hunter in Washington and Noah Buhayar in New York. Editors: Rick Green, Steve Dickson

To contact the reporters on this story: Donal Griffin in New York at dgriffin10@bloomberg.net;

To contact the editor responsible for this story: David Scheer at dscheer@bloomberg.net.


View the original article here