顯示具有 House 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 House 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2012年9月14日 星期五

Ben Bernanke Really Wants You to Buy a House

The Federal Reserve is doing everything in its power to get you to buy a house. On Thursday the Fed’s rate-setting committee said it will start buying $40 billion of mortgage-backed bonds every month from now until—well, it didn’t say when. Buying those bonds should translate into lower mortgage interest rates, speeding up the tentative recovery of the housing market. The Fed is betting that a stronger housing market will help lift the overall economy, which remains stuck in low gear more than three years past the end of the 2007-09 recession.

The Fed’s announcement—immediately dubbed QE3 by the markets, for round three of quantitative easing, or buying bonds to drive down long-term interest rates—had an electric effect on the mortgage market. Investors clamored for mortgage bonds, bidding up their price and thus pushing down their yields. The yield—that is, the effective rate that new investors receive—fell to just 1.01 percentage points above the yield on Treasuries. That was the narrowest spread in almost 15 years, signaling that investors are demanding only a small premium to own mortgage bonds instead of Treasuries. (Technically, that 1.01 is the difference between the yields on a Bloomberg index of Fannie Mae-guaranteed mortgage bonds and the average of 5- and 10-year Treasury notes.)

Mortgage rates are already at historic lows. The average rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage in August was 3.6 percent, says Freddie Mac, down from 6.1 percent at the start of the recession in December 2007.

“If the outlook for the labor market does not improve substantially, the committee will continue its purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities, undertake additional asset purchases and employ its other policy tools as appropriate,” the Federal Open Market Committee said in a statement at the end of its two-day meeting in Washington. At a press conference after the statement was released, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said that while the U.S. has “enjoyed broad price stability” since the mid-1990s, the employment situation remains a “grave concern.” He added: “The weak job market should concern every American.”

The rate setters said they expect the federal funds rate will stay at “exceptionally low levels” at least through mid-2015—vs. a previous expectation of late 2014.

The Fed also released new forecasts in which FOMC participants upgraded their estimate for 2013 economic growth to a range of 2.5 percent to 3 percent, vs. a forecast in June of 2.2 percent to 2.8 percent. They predicted that unemployment in the final three months of this year will average 7.6 percent to 7.9 percent, in line with the June forecast of 7.5 percent to 8 percent.

Since the financial crisis began, the Fed has bought more than $2 trillion worth of Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities. Lately it had focused its efforts on Treasuries. Its holdings of mortgage-backed securities peaked at around $1.1 trillion in 2010 and has lately been a little more than $800 billion. The purchase of $40 billion a month, in addition to the continuing reinvestment of the proceeds from maturing securities, will quickly swell that amount.

Economists called the Fed’s move dramatic. Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist of JPMorgan Chase (JPM), told clients in a note that the Fed’s actions were “extremely aggressive.” Scott Anderson, senior vice president of Bank of the West (BNP), wrote, “The Federal Reserve went all in today.” Barclays (BCS) Research called it “a bold shift in Fed policy.”


View the original article here

2011年5月14日 星期六

House Panel Approves Consumer Bureau Changes

May 13, 2011, 4:32 PM EDT By Phil Mattingly

May 13 (Bloomberg) -- Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee advanced three bills today to reshape the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, turning the tables on Democrats who approved the agency in party-line votes last year.

Lawmakers led by Representative Spencer Bachus, the Alabama Republican who leads the panel, are pushing changes to the Dodd- Frank Act, the regulatory overhaul they’ve targeted since taking control of the House in January. The Republicans have proposed about a dozen bills to revise the new rules, which they were nearly unanimous in opposing when Dodd-Frank was passed in July.

The three bills approved today are “important pieces of legislation, all of which will promote greater certainty for our economy and job creators,” Bachus said yesterday.

After more than 10 hours of debate yesterday over the CFPB measures and a bill to re-authorize the National Flood Insurance Program, Bachus put off until May 24 consideration of an 18- month delay of derivatives rules mandated by Dodd-Frank. The bill would push implementation of rules for the $583 trillion over-the-counter swaps market -- many of them due by July -- to December 2012.

The Republican measures, even if they are approved by the full House, are likely to face opposition from the Senate, which remains in Democratic hands, and from President Barack Obama, who initiated the regulatory overhaul in response to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

Republican Questions

The CFPB, which Obama proposed after financial firms were accused of predatory practices in mortgage and credit-card lending, has faced questions from Bachus and his colleagues over its funding and potential reach. The Republican bills would clamp down on the bureau by replacing its as-yet-unnamed director with a bipartisan, five-member board, delaying its scheduled July 21 start date and making it easier for bank regulators to veto bureau rulemakings.

The proposals have been criticized by consumer groups as a way for Republicans to gut the bureau and undermine Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard University law professor serving as an Obama adviser to shape the agency she’s credited with conceiving.

“This legislation completely disregards and denies the causes of the regulatory failures that led to the current financial crisis,” a group of consumer groups and labor unions, including the AFL-CIO and the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, said in a May 3 letter to committee members.

Necessary Checks

Representative Shelley Moore Capito, a West Virginia Republican, said the bills are necessary checks on the power of bureau that will play a large role in financial markets.

“Whether we like it or not, the bureau will likely be the financial product regulator for the foreseeable future,” said Capito, who leads the financial institutions subcommittee.

Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts and the committee’s Democrats have attacked the bills as delay tactics aimed at weakening consumer protection. The Democrats offered several amendments to change the measures, including one that would require that the president appoint Warren as the chairman should a commission be installed.

“Make no mistake, by expanding the ability for banking regulators to veto the CFPB, I believe that my Republican colleagues are far less concerned about the stability of the banking system, and far more concerned about hurting bank profitability,” Representative Maxine Waters, a California Democrat, said.

--Editors: Gregory Mott, Lawrence Roberts

To contact the reporter on this story: Phil Mattingly in Washington at pmattingly@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Lawrence Roberts at lroberts13@bloomberg.net


View the original article here